5 Best IPRoyal Alternatives in 2025

Based on Trustpilot, 14-18% of IPRoyal users aren't happy with the platform and its products. IPRoyal’s users usually complain about IP quality, IP rotation, session stability, speed, and customer service. Do you too relate to the feeling when your scrapers start jittering like a dying Wi-Fi router? Do your dashboard and logs show rising block rates, too? Do you often wait longer for a response than expected? These are the regular signals that your proxy vendor is quietly failing you. Keep reading to find out the best IPRoyal alternatives in 2025.

Why look for IPRoyal alternatives?

IPs are the spine of the scraping infrastructure. If the spine bends, everything else collapses. With 32M residential IPs and 500K ISP proxies, IPRoyal has the 7th largest advertised pool size among 250+ proxy providers. Yet, it falls short on multiple fronts – performance, quality, trust, unpredictable IPs, uncertain uptime, IP rotation inefficiencies, and questionable customer service.

Developers crave clean IPs, session stability, dependable routing, and flexible IP rotation. They want a surprise-free and frictionless data infrastructure. Any predictable signature from proxy providers means that Cloudflare, Akamai, PerimeterX, DataDome, Kasada, or reCAPTCHA will thwart your requests and disrupt your workflows.

Why should you suffer that? Why should your LLM-driven scrapers choke because your proxy provider gave you an IP that was reused earlier?

You shouldn’t suffer. Consider better IPRoyal alternatives and better-fit proxy providers for your use case.

How to choose the right proxy provider?

Selecting the right proxy provider can make or break your scraping, automation, or content access workflow. Use this checklist to evaluate any IP provider before committing:

1. Proxy pool size & diversity

• Opt for proxy providers with a large IP pool, as this means more options for rotating proxies. Thus, it lowers block rates.
• Opt for a proxy provider with good diversity across countries, cities, ISPs, and ASNs. This helps improve the success rate.

2. Proxy types

• Residential IPs for reliability and block-resistance.
• Mobile proxies for high-trust, hard-to-block routes.
• Datacenter proxy servers for speed and affordability.
• ISP (static residential) IPs for long sessions and account management.

3. Uptime, stability & success rate

• Go for a proxy provider with a higher than 99% infrastructure success rate.
• Always check them against benchmarks for target-site performance (Amazon, Google, and popular social sites).

4. Latency & response times

• For use cases that are time-sensitive, like real-time finance data scraping for insights, retail scraping for price tracking, and accessing sports streaming in restricted geographies, go for proxy providers that offer very fast response times.
• Always assess the average response times of your vendor for popular target websites.

5. IP quality & abuse levels

• Aim for proxy providers who have ethically-sourced proxies and have a good reputation for their IPs. "Safe-range" IPs, a.k.a. clean IPs, lower the chance of triggering CAPTCHA or bans.
• Check proxy provider’s compliance standards, sourcing methods, and abuse prevention policies.

6. Rotation & session controls

• Ensure that your IP provider has a very robust IP rotation controlled on a per-request basis, or sticky sessions (1s to 24h ideally).
• The more smoothly your provider handles long sessions, concurrency, and aggressive rotation, the better it is.

7. Protocol & features

• Your vendor must support the usual protocols: HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5.
• It’s an add-on benefit if your provider can support UDP, WebRTC, browser integrations, and pre-built scraping templates or Web Scraping APIs. Advanced features like AI parsers, residential gateway controls, or browser SDKs can matter at scale for better productivity.
• Don’t overlook clean dashboards, sub-user controls, and strong documentation, as they save huge time.
• The offered API access should be flexible, well-documented, and production-ready.

8. Pricing

• You must factor in cost per GB/IP, volume discounts, and long-term scalability while evaluating IP providers.
• Ensure that the platform is very transparent with billing, and has no hidden fees or invoice surprises later.

9. Miscellaneous

• Look for GDPR/CPRA/SOC 2/ISO 27001 adherence if you’re enterprise-level.
• Check how ethically-sourced their IPs are and whether consent mechanisms exist.
• Prioritize providers with real technical support, not generic chatbots.

Explore the best IPRoyal alternatives

IPRoyal is known for being a budget-friendly proxy provider. But do you seek better performance at scale? Are you building solutions where proxies can be a failure point, and thus need a resilient proxy solution? If so, then this list of the top 5 IPRoyal alternatives in 2025 offers some excellent options for you to consider:

Please note that most of the comparisons we draw between IPRoyal and its alternatives are around residential proxies. The data points are from Proxyway’s market research report 2025. However, on a need basis, we also draw parallels for datacenter, mobile, and ISP proxies, too.

1. Decodo – for scalable scraping and managing multiple accounts

Decodo (formerly known as Smartproxy) is a top alternative to IPRoyal thanks to their 115M+ residential IPs, 10M+ mobile proxies, 500K+ datacenter proxies from 195+ locations and 700+ ASNs. It’s one of the most cost-efficient proxy solutions on the market. You get impressive features like continent, country, city, and even ZIP code-level targeting.

Decodo is an awesome IPRoyal alternative for scraping developers. It offers off-the-shelf solutions like the all-in-one Web Scraping API and AI Parser to make developers’ lives easier.

Besides, all Decodo's offerings are backed by stellar customer support. It also ranks as the #1 proxy provider in IP quality, ensuring you get the best proxies without the risk of rate limitations or bans.

Pool size: Decodo offers 4 times the pool size of IPRoyal. Choosing Decodo as your IPRoyal alternative gets you access to 125M+ proxies. It includes 115M+ residential proxies and 10M+ mobile proxies. Datacenter proxies are about half a million. And of course, you’ve a good pool size of static residential (ISP) IPs, too.

Latency: Decodo has the fastest global average response time of 0.63s with residential proxies. In contrast, IPRoyal is 63% slower. Decodo is twice as fast as IPRoyal if you’re using ISP proxies.

Infrastructure success rate: Decodo (99.86%) has a better success rate than IPRoyal (99.56%). Decodo beats IPRoyal by 0.30%. If you’re using ISP proxies, Decodo has a very high uptime of 100%, while IPRoyal only has 94.75% uptime.

Proxy pool quality: Decodo outscores all mid-market proxy providers, including IPRoyal, when it comes to residential IP quality. Its residential proxy pool is comparatively less likely to be abused. IPRoyal also maintains a high-quality IP pool. However, it lags Decodo by a good margin of 10% (approx. estimate).

Protocol support: Both Decodo and IPRoyal support HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5. Decodo also supports UDP upon request, but IPRoyal doesn’t support that.

Target-specific performance: Decodo’s residential proxies have a high success rate of 92% with target websites like Amazon and Google. IPRoyal is quite behind, with only a 74% success rate. In terms of response time for the target cohort of websites, too, Decodo averages 4.05s, which is faster than IPRoyal’s average of 4.76s.

Documentation: Both IPRoyal and Decodo have thorough documentation of the respective platforms and the products.

API access: Decodo provides robust and powerful API-based access to its pool of residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxies with an intuitive self-service dashboard and sub-user account management feature.

Pricing: Decodo’s residential proxies pricing starts at $3/GB for small-scale use cases, and becomes as affordable as $1.5/GB at scale (>1000GB). The pricing for dedicated ISP proxies starts at $3.33/IP and gets as cheap as $0.27/IP for enterprise-scale shared IP consumption. In contrast, IPRoyal starts at $3.5/GB for a 1 GB plan. However, it beats Decodo’s pricing with a thin margin for small-scale proxy use cases. For instance, it would cost you $2.75/GB with Decodo’s residential proxies up to 8GB. But the same would cost you $2.63/GB.

Available filters: Continent, country, state, city, ZIP.

Country coverage: 195+ countries.

Rotation capabilities: High, providing per-request, session-based, and time-interval rotation, with sticky session options.

Free trial: Available for both proxies (3 days and 100mb free) and the Web Scraping API (7 days and 1,000 requests free).

Off-the-shelf offerings: X Browser, documentation, Proxy checker, YouTube Data for AI, Web Scraping API.

Trustpilot rating: 4.2/5 (1765 reviews).

G2 rating: 4.6/5 (428 reviews).

When to choose Decodo as your IPRoyal alternative: Decodo beats IPRoyal on all fronts. However, if your use case is very small, wherein you need <10 GB of data transmission, IPRoyal could be more cost-efficient. Though that comes at a performance cost, it’s manageable at this small scale. Except for this, for all possible scenarios where you need to use proxies, Decodo is always a better alternative than IPRoyal.

2. SOAX – for time-sensitive proxy needs like price scraping

SOAX has 191M+ IP proxies under its umbrella. That’s 6 times the IP pool size of IPRoyal. This proxy provider has a very good reputation for high-quality IPs. It has close to 33% of its residential IPs in the moderate to safe zone, i.e., about 51.15M+. The same for IPRoyal is only 27%, i.e., approximately 8M+. SOAX outshines IPRoyal in terms of infrastructure success rate and global response time as well. Undoubtedly, it is 1 of the best IPRoyal alternatives in the proxy market. However, IPRoyal has a pricing advantage over SOAX, and a response time advantage, too, when it comes to accessing popular target websites.

Pool size: SOAX’s pool size is 6X larger and globally distributed than IPRoyal’s smaller, less diverse, and concentrated pool, which reduces IPRoyal’s effectiveness for large-scale or geographically sensitive workloads. SOAX has 155M+ residential proxies, 2M+ US ISPs, 300K+ datacenter IPs, and 33M+ mobile proxies.

Latency: SOAX generally performs faster than IPRoyal in Proxyway’s 2024–2025 latency tests. Its residential proxies exhibit a 0.9s global average response time, which for IPRoyal is 1.06s. Even for the ISP proxies, SOAX (0.23s) is twice as fast as IPRyal (0.46s). For almost every region, SOAX beat IPRoyal with a faster response time. However, India is an exception, wherein IPRoyal beats SOAX IPs.

Infrastructure success rate: With residential proxies, SOAX has an amazing strike rate of 99.73%. IPRoyal isn’t that behind either, with 99.56%. However, for ISP proxies, IPRoyal (94.75%) is significantly behind SOAX (99.78%) by a good gap of 5%.

Proxy pool quality: 51.15M+ residential proxies of SOAX are considered moderate to very safe. IPRoyal only has 8M+ proxies that are less likely to be regarded as BOT or TOR traffic.

Protocol support: SOAX supports SOCKS5 and UDP, but not HTTPS. IPRoyal supports HTTPS and SOCKS5, but not UDP.

Target-specific performance: SOAX (90.27%) has a significantly higher infrastructure success rate for popular target websites than IPRoyal (74.63%). However, for the same popular target websites, SOAX (5.52s) has a comparatively poorer response time than IPRoyal (4.76s).

Documentation: Available for both SOAX and IPRoyal. SOAX documentation is rich with examples. However, IPRoyal has much better, thorough documentation, and is suited for beginners and specialist developers who need explanations and clarity.

API access: SOAX provides a Web Data API to extract data from any site – no proxy management, CAPTCHA solving, or JavaScript rendering is needed.

Pricing: For up to 25 GB, SOAX residential proxies cost you $3.6/GB (billed monthly $90). The price becomes affordable at scale, i.e., $2/GB for a monthly commitment of a minimum of 800 GB. IPRoyal has an edge with pricing for small-scale proxy use cases. It starts at $3.50/GB for a 1 GB commitment. And gets as low as $2.45/GB for the 50 GB plan. It saves you 33% of costs.

Available filters: Country, state, city, IP quantity, and stability.

Rotation capabilities: Strong; AI-driven routing, sticky session options.

Country coverage: 195+ geolocations available.

Free trial: 3-day 400MB trial for $1.99.

Off-the-shelf offerings: Web Data API, IP checker, online proxy checker, cURL converter, browser fingerprinting test, free proxy list.

Trustpilot rating: 4.1/5 (145 reviews).

G2 rating: 4.8/5 (65 reviews).

When to choose SOAX over IPRoyal: SOAX is a good IPRoyal alternative if you want to scrape at scale, maintain social accounts at scale, or ensure a high success rate for popular target websites. However, if you don’t need proxies at scale, and if your use case is as small as scraping 100K pages to 1M pages, or browsing location-protected websites in a limited manner, IPRoyal would make better sense given the low prices. For time-sensitive price scraping or travel booking availability scraping from popular target websites, IPRoyal would be a better option than SOAX.

Suggested reading: 5 best SOAX alternatives in 2025

3. NetNut – for scraping popular targets or professional datasets

NetNut is your IPRoyal alternative if a comparatively larger pool size with a good number of unique IPs is what you are after. It advertises 85M+ residential IPs, 5M+ mobile proxies, 1M+ ISPs, and 150K+ datacenter IPs across 195 geographical locations. Though NetNut lags IPRoyal in terms of success rate and response speed for generic websites, it is the preferred choice for web scrapers for popular target websites like Amazon, Shopee, Google, Instagram, etcetera.

Pool size: NetNut’s global IP pool is significantly bigger than IPRoyal’s 32M IP footprint. NetNut has 91M+ IPs across residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile proxies. This gives you a stronger subnet diversity, more ASNs, and better distribution for high-volume web scraping or geographically distributed tasks. IPRoyal’s comparatively smaller pool limits entropy.

Latency: NetNut has a higher latency (1.22s) than IPRoyal (1.06s). But with datacenter proxies, it beats all other proxy providers, and has the lowest latency of only 0.22s. For ISPs, it significantly outperforms IPRoyal and is 2X faster.

Infrastructure success rate: NetNut has a lower infrastructure success rate of 98.4% compared to 99.56% of IPRoyal. For mobile proxies (97.31%) and datacenter IPs (96.54%), the success rate dips even further for NetNut. However, for ISPs, it has a strike rate of 100%.

Proxy pool quality: NetNut has a larger pool of high-quality proxies than IPRoyal. Though it has only about 22% of proxies that are less likely to be flagged, that still translates to 16.5M+ high-quality IP pool. That’s 2X the high-quality IP pool size of IPRoyal.

Protocol support: Like IPRoyal, NetNut also supports HTTPS and SOCKS5, but not UDP.

Target-specific performance: With an average 91.34% infrastructure success rate for popular target websites, NetNut significantly outperforms IPRoyal (74.63%). Not just that, NetNut also has a far better average response time of 4.36s vs 4.76s of IPRoyal for popular target websites. With ISPs, NetNut’s success rate of 98.88% is quite high for popular target websites, when compared to IPRoyal’s 73.72%.

Documentation: NetNut has a very comprehensive documentation knowledge base and has integration examples. However, examples are gated behind logins.

API access: NetNut offers SERP and B2B data Web Scraping API.

Pricing: NetNut’s residential proxies cost $3/GB for up to 28GB, and as low as $2.43/GB for 350 GB per month consumption. In contrast, IPRoyal starts at $3.50/GB, and costs $2.45/GB for the 50 GB plan. For mobile proxies and ISP proxies, IPRoyal charges based on duration and number of IPs. However, NetNut charges based on the amount of data transferred.

Available filters: NetNut does provide country, state, and city filters; however, IPRoyal has better additional filtering options – IP quantity, quality, exclude ISP proxies, and IP ranges.

Rotation capabilities: Strong; rotates on every request or session; custom duration is not available; however, geo-sessions are available for longer durations.

Country coverage: IPs available from across 195+ countries, including the USA (2M+), UK (1M+), and India (1M+).

Free trial: Unavailable. However, as per Proxyway, NetNut offers a trial for enterprise clients.

Off-the-shelf offerings: Professional profile dataset (250M+) and Company dataset (50M+).

Trustpilot rating: 4.6/5 (190 reviews).

G2 rating: 4.9/5 (390 reviews).

When to choose NetNut over IPRoyal: NetNut’s larger and more stable pool is a real advantage over IPRoyal. Choose NetNut as an IPRoyal alternative when you’re scraping popular target websites, as NetNut beats IPRoyal’s performance by a fair margin, or when you need professional profile datasets from LinkedIn.

Suggested reading: 6 best NetNut alternatives in 2025

4. Rayobyte – for low-cost residential proxies at the cost of performance

Rayobyte is very similar to IPRoyal. It has a similar IP pool size to that of IPRoyal and matches most of the features that IPRoyal provides. Rayobyte presents a well-rounded residential proxy offering with an ethical-sourcing foundation, dependable infrastructure, and a user-friendly experience – all of which make it an excellent IPRoyal alternative.

Pool size: As per Rayobyte, it has 40M+ residential IPs and 300K+ datacenter proxies under its belt. It does provide ISPs and mobile proxies as well; however, they haven’t disclosed the exact pool size of these IPs.

Latency: Rayobyte lags IPRoyal or any other proxy provider by a huge margin, and its proxies are way too slow, with an average response time of 2.09s. For IPRoyal, this number stands at 1.06s. However, with ISP proxies, Rayobyte has the second-best response time of 0.1s, far ahead of IPRoyals' 0.46s.

Infrastructure success rate: Rayobyte is at par with IPRoyal with its global average infrastructure success rate of 99.47% for residential proxies, which is close enough to IPRoyal’s 99.56%. But Rayobyte ranked last in Proxyway’s research when it came to infrastructure success rate with ISP proxies. It scored only 81.14% in contrast to IPRoyal’s 94.75%.

Proxy pool quality: Both IPRoyal and Rayobyte have a very similar pool of high-quality IPs. Both are equally likely to be flagged as bots. However, IPRoyal has a larger percentage of safe proxies compared to Rayobyte.

Protocol support: Both of them support HTTPS and SOCKS5.

Target-specific performance: Rayobyte has a better infrastructure success rate with popular target websites, i.e., 88.21%. For IPRoyal, it is 74.63% only. But Rayobyte has a very slow response speed for popular target websites, averaging 7.15, which is 75% slower than IPRoyal.

Documentation: Rayobyte does have API documentation, but to access it, you’ve to log in.

API access: They do have a Web Scraping API. The regular API to access IPs is less advanced than some competitors, but it provides essential controls.

Pricing: Rayobyte is very affordable for moderate to large-scale residential proxy use cases where latency isn’t a deal breaker. For up to 50GB, IPRoyal is more affordable. IPRoyal costs $2.45/GB if you need 50 GB or less/month. However, beyond 50 GB needs, Rayobyte is $2/GB, and for beyond 1000 GB, Rayobyte is as cheap as $0.90/GB. Except for residential proxies, Rayobyte isn’t your ideal choice as ISPs, mobile proxies, and even datacenter IPs are costlier than IPRoyal.

Available filters: Same as IPRoyal, it provides country, state, and city filters; ISP/ASN features are amiss.

Rotation capabilities: Solid; focusing on ease-of-use and flexible access.

Country coverage: 163+ countries.

Free trial: Available. 5000 free scrapes with Web Scraping API.

Off-the-shelf offerings: Site Unblocker, Web Scraping API.

Trustpilot rating: 4.1/5 (112 reviews).

G2 rating: 4.8/5 (2 reviews).

When to choose Rayobyte over IPRoyal: You can choose Rayobyte as the IPRoyal alternative if you need residential proxies at a discount price, and if your use case isn’t time-sensitive or performance-sensitive.

5. Bright Data – for evolving proxy requirements

Bright Data is a heavyweight alternative to IPRoyal. It is built for large-scale scraping, enterprise compliance, complex rotation pathways, SDK-based orchestration, and multi-product AI scraping stacks. With 1 of the largest and fastest-growing residential proxy pools in the world, Bright Data offers unmatched configuration depth. It doubles down on compliance rigor, ethical-sourcing, and granular control across regions, ASNs, session behavior, and backconnect channels.

Compared to IPRoyal, Bright Data is far more enterprise-oriented and built for serious data-intelligence workloads at scale. It is significantly more capable and expansive than IPRoyal in every engineering dimension that matters for scale: IP entropy, geographic footprint, tooling variety, and network robustness.

Pool size: Bright Data offers 1 of the largest pools globally, with 150M+ residential IPs, 7M+ mobile proxies, and 1.3M+ datacenter proxy servers. It’s 4x larger than IPRoyal’s 32M+ residential IP pool. Bright Data’s YoY IP pool size growth of 109% demonstrates aggressive scaling and stronger IP diversity. IPRoyal’s pool is stable and compliant, but relatively much smaller. For any workload needing high IP entropy, large-scale city-level segmentation, or high-frequency rotation, Bright Data vastly outperforms IPRoyal.

Latency: Bright Data’s global latency performance for residential proxies is competitive, with an average response time of 1.12s. IPRoyal is slightly faster on paper with 1.06s, but the difference is marginal in real workloads. Bright Data’s strength lies in consistent routing and broader infrastructure distribution, while IPRoyal is more optimized for mid-market usage patterns. For mobile proxies, the performance looks relatively similar, with Bright Data infrastructure response time averaging 1.97s.

Infrastructure success rate: Bright Data’s success rate (as of 2024) is high but not industry-leading. It sits below IPRoyal. IPRoyal’s 99.56% success rate is marginally better than Bright Data’s 98.96%. Yet Bright Data compensates with a larger and cleaner routing architecture, making its real-world performance more resilient under scale.

Proxy pool quality: Bright Data’s proxy pool quality isn’t publicly disclosed/researched. However, Bright Data’s enormous pool size, enterprise compliance programs, and aggressive policing of traffic sources strongly indicate a high-quality supply chain, even though exact safe-rate numbers aren’t published.

Protocol support: Both Bright Data and IPRoyal support HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 for residential, mobile, and datacenter proxies. It also supports UDP requests for enterprise customers.

Documentation: Bright Data has a comprehensive documentation with quick start guides, configuration examples, and FAQs.

API access: Bright Data provides 1 of the most advanced APIs in the proxy ecosystem. You get access to scraping browser APIs, high-level multi-product integrations, and deep, developer-oriented endpoints. In contrast, IPRoyal’s API is simpler. IPRoyal prioritizes ease of use over advanced configuration or enterprise tooling.

Pricing: With a starting price for residential proxies at $4/GB under the pay-as-you-go (PAYG) model, it is slightly premium priced compared to IPRoyal. However, it gets cheaper at scale and matches IPRoyal’s pricing if your monthly commitment is north of 800 GB.

Available filters: Bright data offers extensive filters – country, state, city, ZIP, coordinates; you can also filter based on OS or target individual IPs. As per Proxyway, ZIP and coordinate level filtering are missing with IPRoyal.

Rotation capabilities: Flexible, including backconnect and SDK-based models.

Country coverage: 195 geographical locations.

Free trial: Available (as per Proxyway report 2025).

Off-the-shelf offerings: Video & media data, agent browser, datasets from popular target websites, retail insights, deep lookup, browser API.

Trustpilot rating: 4.3/5 (894 reviews).

G2 rating: 4.6/5 (264 reviews).

When to choose Bright Data over IPRoyal: Bright Data can be your IPRoyal alternative if your proxy needs are elastic and may evolve/scale with time. For anyone running distributed AI pipelines, real-time scraping operations, retail intelligence platforms, or high-frequency geographic tests, Bright Data is a significantly stronger alternative than IPRoyal. It beats IPRoyal in every enterprise-level metric: scale, coverage, rotation flexibility, developer configurability, and long-session stability. IPRoyal is a better fit only if you prioritize cost, simple usage, and small-to-mid-scale scraping.

Recommended reading: Best Bright Data alternatives in 2025

Here’s a summary of the top IPRoyal alternatives to try in 2025:

1. Decodo – for scalable scraping and managing multiple accounts
2. SOAX – for time-sensitive proxy needs like price scraping
3. NetNut – for scraping popular targets or professional datasets
4. Rayobyte – for low-cost residential proxies at the cost of performance
5. Bright Data – for evolving proxy requirements

Conclusion

If you want the best overall alternative in every performance dimension, choose Decodo. It beats IPRoyal across the board, except for very tiny workloads (<10GB), where IPRoyal may be cheaper – at the cost of performance, but still manageable at that scale.

Alternatively, though not better than Decodo, you may choose Bright Data if you need enterprise-scale flexibility. It’s the stronger pick for AI pipelines, intensive scraping, long sessions, and evolving workloads.

Go for Rayobyte as your IPRoyal alternative if you only care about the lowest possible cost and your tasks aren’t time-critical.

NetNut and SOAX are equally good contenders, and you may go for them as well for better customer service or to manage multiple accounts with popular target websites.

While here, explore the top alternatives to industry giants like Bright Data and Oxylabs. We also have a detailed article on the differences between ISP and residential proxies to help you choose the best proxy type for your use case.