Best Oxylabs Alternatives

Decodo offers a fast time to value and an excellent balance between quality and affordability, making it a strong choice for both businesses and individuals alike.

Their pool of 125M+ IPs from 195+ locations covers all proxy types, including residential proxies, datacenter proxies, mobile proxies, and ISP proxies (static residential). This allows you to handle a variety of eCommerce scraping, SERP monitoring, multi-accounting, and other data collection use cases.

Decodo also offers Web Scraping API with 100+ pre-made scraping templates built for the most popular targets. Features like task scheduling, bulk upload, and automatic retries keep your data collection running without constant oversight.

Performance-wise, Decodo leads the market with <0.2s response times, success rates up to 99.98%, and unlimited concurrent sessions. It also integrates with AI workflows through their MCP server, n8n node, and LangChain support, making it straightforward to pipe web data into your AI agents and LLMs.

How does it compare? Besides being a well-rounded option for any team, Decodo's pricing is more accessible than Oxylabs, and it has built-in support for AI workflows. This makes it a powerful option for mid-market businesses working on AI-powered data projects.

SOAX is a proxy provider known for its flexibility and precision, making it a strong option for those who need extra control over their proxies. It offers precise targeting options, making it a great option for use cases like SERP monitoring and search engine optimization.

SOAX is also valued for its customizable proxy management tools, allowing quick and easy configuration for various use cases. With a proxy pool of 191M+ residential, datacenter, mobile, and ISP IPs, it’s a more affordable alternative to premium providers like Oxylabs.

However, SOAX is a bit more expensive than most other proxy providers and has little flexibility with its payment plans. So, users are often stuck with paying for more than they really need.

How does it compare? With a 191M+ IP pool (compared to Oxylabs' 177M+), SOAX provides flexible proxy management tools at competitive rates. It works well for teams that need precise targeting and granular control without committing to enterprise-level plans.

ScraperAPI is a web scraping API built to simplify data extraction by handling proxy-related challenges. The tool automatically rotates IPs from a pool of 40M+ proxies across 50+ countries and can render JavaScript, ensuring high success rates on difficult targets.

It’s specialized for fetching structured data from search engines, eCommerce platforms, listing sites, and various other targets. The API supports many popular languages, including Python, cURL, and Node.js, and provides extensive documentation on how to set it all up.

While it's a versatile scraping solution, ScraperAPI doesn’t offer standalone proxies, meaning that you can’t use their proxies separately from their API endpoint.

How does it compare? ScraperAPI simplifies the process by handling everything through a single API endpoint, no proxy setup required. This makes implementation faster for developers who prefer a managed scraping solution over dealing with proxy infrastructure.

Bright Data is a proxy, data extraction, and pre-built dataset solution provider. They offer residential, ISP, datacenter, and mobile proxies across 150M+ proxy IPs from 195 countries.

Beyond their main offering, Bright Data also provides tools like Web Unlocker API, APIs for specific targets, a Browser API, browser extensions, and various integrations.

The downside is that Bright Data's pricing is among the highest in the market, and the platform is built for teams running large-scale, enterprise-level data operations.

How does it compare? Both Bright Data and Oxylabs serve enterprise clients with premium pricing, but Bright Data includes a Dataset Marketplace. It's built as a complete data collection platform rather than just proxies.

NetNut is a robust proxy provider specializing in high-volume web scraping, designed primarily for enterprise clients. It offers rotating residential, static residential, datacenter, and mobile proxies across 85M+ IP addresses from 195+ countries.

One of NetNut’s standout features is its scraper APIs and datasets, offering access to over 250M professional profiles and 50M companies, saving significant time and resources.

Like Bright Data, NetNut’s focus is also set on large-scale scraping operations, making it a more expensive option compared to some of its competitors.

How does it compare? NetNut is a solid enterprise option for teams that prioritize connection reliability at a similar price to Oxylabs. Besides that, they have a strong dataset offering.

Zyte is a specialized provider of web scraping services rather than traditional proxy offerings. Its API is built to handle high-volume data collection across various use cases, including eCommerce, social media, SERPs, and data for AI.

Zyte also provides access to ready-made datasets, which simplifies the data collection process and reduces the need for extensive developer resources.

However, besides not having a standalone proxy offering, users have noted that Zyte can end up being expensive with larger data collection projects.

How does it compare? Zyte doesn't offer standalone proxies like Oxylabs does, and instead, everything runs through their scraping API. It’s a ready-to-use alternative for data teams focused on data extraction rather than managing infrastructure.